I found this through the Owner Link website:Did your letter give you any other information, such as a web sit where your (we) can look at it and find out what will be updated? Richard
I agree, I am going to wait tiill 2012....then I might wait till 2013 just in case 2012 is the end of rhe worldNot exactly sure what updates might entail...
If it's just streets and listings, I'm not paying for it. Not enough new construction in my area to have any real effect.
If would add functionality to the Nav system (OS Features, etc) than I'm sure I will pay for it. I'm a sucker for new toys.
I saw that too but they got it bid up to 101[/quote]
With it being on fleabay i would not be surprised if it goes to $179.....[/quote]I saw that too but they got it bid up to 101
I have the same build date.I just bought my CT on Oct 22 (build date 09/10). Is it possible the 2011 maps are already installed? How could I check?
OK, thanks! I didn't know that.I have the same build date.
The version in my car is 4.81A
The latest version is 4.92.
(If you turn your car on, go to the rear hatch, you can eject and look at the DVD. It's under the right cargo compartment.)
I agree a little with the Honda GPS. It’s not the best when compared to an after market GPS but when compared to original equipment GPS it's pretty good. Yes, it is a bit out dated when it comes to restaurants but in today's world, restaurants open and close like every other day.We just got back from a 2.5K mile round trip to southern Kalifornia - first real road trip for the CT. I was quite disappointed in two things - the GPS took us to several businesses that had obviously been closed for several years, not to mention having us going in circles a time or two - making u-turns when not really needed, etc. Secondly, highway/Interstate mileage only @ 26mpg at 80 MPH with the CC on. I was really expecting @ 30+ MPG like the '04 Accord V6. Anyway - I was quite disappointed in the on-board GPS after using a Garmin 276C for years. When selecting routes, it would often give several choices that we essentially identical with no other options. At this point in technological development, I expect MUCH more. For what it costs, the factory GPS is a major POS in my opinion.
We just got back from a 2.5K mile round trip to southern Kalifornia - first real road trip for the CT. I was quite disappointed in two things - the GPS took us to several businesses that had obviously been closed for several years, not to mention having us going in circles a time or two - making u-turns when not really needed, etc. Secondly, highway/Interstate mileage only @ 26mpg at 80 MPH with the CC on. I was really expecting @ 30+ MPG like the '04 Accord V6. Anyway - I was quite disappointed in the on-board GPS after using a Garmin 276C for years. When selecting routes, it would often give several choices that we essentially identical with no other options. At this point in technological development, I expect MUCH more. For what it costs, the factory GPS is a major POS in my opinion.
The technology and usability of my 6 or 7 year old Garmin unit is WAY better than the Honda OEM unit, at about 1/3 the cost. My bad for not trying the Honda unit before buying!!With all that said, OEM nav systems often lack compared to the latest aftermarket units mainly because 1) The development time means OEM units are often not state-of-the-art and 2) Aftermarket manufacturers have to push the envelope and come out with bigger and greater all the time just to compete in the market place.